Social scientist hold a view that might not be popular with some of the population or a view that most of the population has not even thought of before so I believe that social scientist should be engaging in public debate, but there are roadblocks to this happening. The sociological perspective is so hidden because of money or educational requirements that if an individual wants to learn more about what a social scientist is talking about they have to have the access to pay for the articles and the literacy to read at the scholarly level which is a huge roadblock because the majority of the population today is in a poor class level. The articles that are being read are only by they top 1% of the population which is not enough people to make a change, so why not open up the academic articles to all individuals and not just right the article in the context of colleagues to read but in the context of an everyday individual. When learning the sociological view I never really thought of the debate on academics vs activism but now reading about it the debate is one that will always be a struggle for sociologist. I do believe that sociologist that do not work in the university have the debate easier because they are specialized in more of an occupational area that they can spread their knowledge on.
References
Jurgenson, Nathan. "How Academics Can Become Relevant." Cypborology. Retrieved September 12, 2017. (https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2012/01/23/how-academics-can-become-relevant/).
Rojas, Rubio. "why activism and academia don't mix." Orgtheory. Retrieved September 12, 2017. (https://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2013/03/31/why-activism-and-academia-dont-mix/).
No comments:
Post a Comment